<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nate's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://natesblog.org</link>
	<description>Welcome to Nate's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does &#8220;Jesus Only&#8221; Bug You?</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=170</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=170#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heaven]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jesus only]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nature of truth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesus only.  Yeah, I know.  It seems narrow.  And it's certainly uncomfortable, even for many Christ-followers.  But . . . should we always expect truth to be comfortable?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jesus only.  Yeah, I know.  It seems narrow.  And it's certainly uncomfortable, even for many Christ-followers.  But . . . should we always expect truth to be comfortable?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=170</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evil and suffering proves . . . not what you think.</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=153</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=153#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[atheism vs. theism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beliefs about God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faith and public discourse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[skepticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truth about God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some folks think the existence of evil and suffering proves that God doesn't exist.  Actually, if anything, it more likely proves He does.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evil and suffering proves . . . not what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=153</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If God is loving, surely he won&#8217;t hold us accountable for right belief.  Right?</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=149</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beliefs about God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[doctrinaire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[doctrinal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[doctrine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[narrow minded faith]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[skepticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sound doctrine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truth about God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If God is as Christians claim, loving and caring, then surely He won't hold us accountable for believing correctly.  Right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If God is as Christians claim, loving and caring, then surely He won't hold us accountable for believing correctly.  Right?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=149</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can there be just &#8220;one true religion&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=127</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=127#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Christ alone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[exclusivism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever thought about the "counter claims" between "just one true religion" and "all religions have part of the truth but not all of it"?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have you ever thought about the "counter claims" between "just one true religion" and "all religions have part of the truth but not all of it"?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=127</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stem cells, human life, and ethics</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=106</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[atheism vs. theism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human embryo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[image of God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[morals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stem cell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unborn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[value of human life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama&#8217;s recent decision to allow for stem cell research to expand to the human embryo is a big deal.  So what are the issues at stake . . . or is it just tissue we&#8217;re talking about?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama&#8217;s recent decision to allow for stem cell research to expand to the human embryo is a big deal.  So what are the issues at stake . . . or is it just tissue we&#8217;re talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=106</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stem cells and the nature of life</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=104</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=104#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[atheism vs. theism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human embryonic stem cells]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[image of God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[material world]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[morals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question regarding human embryonic stem cells is not whether it&#8217;s human life.  The secular scientists tell us that the human embryo is both living and distinctly human.  The question then becomes, what is the nature and value of human life.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question regarding human embryonic stem cells is not whether it&#8217;s human life.  The secular scientists tell us that the human embryo is both living and distinctly human.  The question then becomes, what is the nature and value of human life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=104</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it cool to talk about stem cells and God?</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=101</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=101#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[embryo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faith and public discourse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faith and science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[human life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[value of human life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people think it&#8217;s not cool to talk about God in public debate/discourse.  President Obama talks about &#8220;separating idealogy from the science.&#8221;   Sounds okay . . . but there is human life involved here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people think it&#8217;s not cool to talk about God in public debate/discourse.  President Obama talks about &#8220;separating idealogy from the science.&#8221;   Sounds okay . . . but there is human life involved here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=101</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. Magorium, the box, and life</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=84</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[existence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[existential]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Magorium]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve seen this really cool movie entitled &#8220;Mr. Magorium&#8217;s Wonder Emporium&#8221;. While not a theistic or Judeo-Christian movie, it asks this really big question&#8230;is there more to life than what we see? Or, in the language of the movie, &#8220;Is it just a box?&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve seen this really cool movie entitled &#8220;Mr. Magorium&#8217;s Wonder Emporium&#8221;. While not a theistic or Judeo-Christian movie, it asks this really big question&#8230;is there more to life than what we see? Or, in the language of the movie, &#8220;Is it just a box?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=84</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does &#8220;Jesus only&#8221; bug you?</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=52</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=52#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of people are generally okay with Christianity but it&#8217;s the thing about &#8220;Jesus only&#8221; which is the big turn off.  How can God be fair if there&#8217;s only one way to Him?  Well, here&#8217;s a new take on Christ alone.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people are generally okay with Christianity but it&#8217;s the thing about &#8220;Jesus only&#8221; which is the big turn off.  How can God be fair if there&#8217;s only one way to Him?  Well, here&#8217;s a new take on Christ alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=52</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What about hell?</title>
		<link>http://natesblog.org/?p=48</link>
		<comments>http://natesblog.org/?p=48#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natesblog.org/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk about the ultimately uncomfortable topic!  Hell is a myth, right?  Nobody really believes this stuff, right?  Well, think about this.  Isn&#8217;t hell a subject so deadly serious that at least at some point in our lives we need to take a moment and think seriously about it?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about the ultimately uncomfortable topic!  Hell is a myth, right?  Nobody really believes this stuff, right?  Well, think about this.  Isn&#8217;t hell a subject so deadly serious that at least at some point in our lives we need to take a moment and think seriously about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://natesblog.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=48</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
